FERRET-SEARCH Archives

Searchable FML archives

FERRET-SEARCH@LISTSERV.FERRETMAILINGLIST.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Leonard Bottleman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 17 Oct 2000 08:11:32 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
I have had first hand experience with a large number (around 30) of retired
or culled breeders from Two Pole Pumpkin about three years ago, plus second
hand experience about the conditions at Two Pole.
 
Nearly half of the unwanted ferrets that were purchased from Two Pole (no,
they were not relinquished, they had to be purchased) had some form of
genetic problems, mostly involving facial or limb deformities.  Most of
the ferrets were severe biters, although this may have been from lack of
handling rather than genetic dispositions.
 
The second hand information about the conditions at Two Pole came from the
shelter operator who purchased the Two Pole retirees.  The entire facility
is outdoors, with a large roof structure (no walls) providing shelter from
the rain (or snow) and direct sun.  Rows of wire cages ran the length of
the ferretry with bare wire bottoms and only a wood plank for a place to
sleep.  Feces and urine drop through the wire floor to the ground.  Ferrets
do not get out to play.  Retirees were not euthanized, but are forced to
endure life confinement in their small wire cages (rather than working with
a shelter to place them, and no I don't consider holding out for a price to
be "working with a shelter").
 
I think Carla's comments about the Oregon ferret community failing Two Pole
are partly correct, but when help and guidance are rejected, it really is
difficult to make a positive difference.
 
Leonard Bottleman                    [log in to unmask]
[Posted in FML issue 3209]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2