Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.FERRETMAILINGLIST.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - FERRET-SEARCH Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

FERRET-SEARCH Archives

Searchable FML archives

FERRET-SEARCH@LISTSERV.FERRETMAILINGLIST.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
FERRET-SEARCH Home FERRET-SEARCH Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Kodo
Chris Heath <[log in to unmask]>
Tue, 10 Jun 1997 21:46:16 -0400
text/plain (20 lines)
Did Karen Burns indicate in court that she was going to euthanize Kodo
because no studies had been done with the bat virus and ferrets?  If so, did
she also state that no studies had been done on dogs or cats with the bat
variant of the virus, but she declined to euthanize them?  It seems to me
that only making the statement about the ferrets is not "the truth, the
whole truth, and nothing but the truth."
 
Why would Harry Chaddock's (the State Head Vet) boss tell him to stay out of
the Kodo issue?  Just who is his boss?  Doesn't it seem as if a veterinarian
should get involved?  It seemed from Gary Holwicki's conversation with him
that he might be convinced (given enough information), and he could possibly
direct Karen Burns to release Kodo to his owners.  She did say that if
someone with more authority than she were to give this order, she would
comply.
 
We have to keep fighting.
 
chris
[Posted in FML issue 1964]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.FERRETMAILINGLIST.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV