>Sandi
>PS: And NOOOOOO.  I am NOT in agreement with Danielle on the petco issue.
>She's done more damage to our efforts in Washington state to communicate
>with petco, than any other 100 people.
 
Oh?  Please elaborate.  Let's see...when I went to lunch with Lisa Helzer
(RACC) she asked me "who is this Sandi Ackerman?" Of course, she found
out and was relieved to hear that her first impression of Sandi was
confirmed to be the right one.
 
I would certainly LOVE to know what you are referring to when you say "I
have done more damage in WA State to communicate with Petco than any
other 100 people".  Interesting, Sandi.  I hope there ARE 100 others out
there who will help the situation instead of just sitting on their hands
and letting others do everything.
 
On another note...one of the rabbit groups (bigger than what you belong
to) has asked me to write an article for their newsletter about Petco.
Guess they weren't aware that you are the "Washington expert" on Petco
(and rabbits).  Hmmmm.....
 
Do you ever stop?  This was a very poor attempt at insulting me and I
think it is going to backfire on you.  If I were you, Sandi, I would be
very careful about the insults...the IRS does not look kindly on those
who pose as non-profits but are actually for profit ventures.  Those who
live in glass houses, should not throw stones.  I was, at the very least,
nice in my response to your post but I guess that you just couldn't leave
it at that.  When I am attacked, you WILL definitely get a response and
your dirty laundry WILL be made public.  Yes, those you trust here, have
also told me plenty about you and what goes on.
 
BIG- you have my permission to allow Ms. Ackerman to elaborate on her
accusations regarding me with Petco, provided they are concrete and
verifiable, rather than her attempting to insult me or bash me to others.
 
[Moderator's note: FACTS please... not accusations.  Further name-calling
posts about the topic will not appear in the digest.  Factual posts are
always welcome.  BIG]
[Posted in FML issue 3852]