>If Marshall settles to you for anything at all it is because a settlement >is cheaper than a lawyer and an attempt to foster goodwill. There are too >many people trying to find someone else to blame for all of their problems. Looking back at Elf's post, I see only that the pet store may make restitution. Nothing there about MAR,INC "settling" anything. Anyone should have every right to expect a kit from a pet store to be free of disease. Should it turn out otherwise, they should have the right of recourse. If they incur further expense by bring a sick kit home to infect healthy animals, there should be restitution for that as well. As for "there are too many people......", where's the relevancy?. She didn't have a problem until she went to a Petco store and bought a MF kit. Glenn J. Chuki.....I love what Kate Pappas wrote about little Emmet [Posted in FML issue 2262]