Wow, I want to say thanks to all of those who wrote saying nice things about my post. I don't usually say much, but this article REALLY pissed me off. I thought I'd let you know what else has happened as well. I noticed that someone on the FML made the comment that you couldn't reply to the article any more. {hehehehe evil laughter} As I am not one who likes to hear "you can't", I went to the site and prepared to do some hacking to find a way to get my message posted. It wasn't as hard as I thought. You can't hit the link 'reply form' from the reply page, you get a 404 message. So I just went to the page manually and it worked fine. One problem: There is a 250 word limit. No problem, I copy and pasted 250 words (starting at the bottom) into the box. Labeled it Part 3 and submitted it. I did the same thing for the other 3 parts. Due to miscalculation, the reply is 4 posts long instead of the expected 3. I posted in reverse so that when the 'editor' entered them (according to which s/he got first, newest being at the top of the page) they would be in the correct order. Well, I haven't seen my reply on their website yet.... but this is an *extremely* detailed summary of the reply I got: ( I can't post actual message according to BIG) I received from Susan Mulvihill (the Production Coordinator of Virtually Northwest), on Friday, January 02, 1998 at 12:51 PM an e-mail that she has reassembled my comments on Doug Clark's column about the ferret vigil and she is forwarding them to Richard Wagoner, the City Editor. She appreciates me taking the time to give them feedback. The Spokesman-Review web site address is http://www.VirtuallyNW.com Susan Mulvihill's e-mail address is: [log in to unmask] {in a sing-song voice} I think someone we all know and detest will be starting an extended vacation in the very near future. {dook dook} They better watch out! Christine is war-dancing again! [Posted in FML issue 2178]