>From: Lori Sies <[log in to unmask]> >Subject: Wood Pellet Warning - Rebuttal >First my apologies to anyone who got their hairs raised. Accepted from at least us. We'll explain why we saw it the way we did and why we reacted. >On the digestible part - I missworded it. The Luv My Kitty is passing >through their system where the Lignetics Wood Pellet Fuel didn't. You answered this one yourself. Mistakes happen so hopefully no hard feelings either way - none were intended. We obviously mistook your intentions and we are sorry. But you did not explain about the local cases so you put out dire warnings with no backing data but a way by sending money to solve the problem that was not fully explained. That's why it sounded commercial. If you had put in the bit about what happened to your kits it would have made a complete difference in perception. We are very sorry for what happened to your kits. >I was using Lignetics Wood Pellet Fuel. After the completely happy and successful uses of wood pellets elsewhere it would be probably a good idea to figure out what is different about this type. Obviously since it was not intended as use as a litter it is NOT the fault of the manufacturer (as long as it burns well). Is this a coated pellet? The cheaper uncoated pellets are much better than the slightly more expensive coated pellets that burn better. bill and diane killian zen and the art of ferrets http://www.zenferret.com/ mailto:[log in to unmask] [Posted in FML issue 1992]