>Third - Can "we" take an add out in the paper about the "sanctuary"? >Saying that is unsafe or something? If you do so you open yourself up to a libel suit. You must stick to verifiable facts. You can publish that she was convicted of improperly running a shelter and is currently on probation for the same, for instance. You can NOT publish that she is running an unsafe shelter - that's conjecture. You can NOT publish that the 261 ferrets were mistreated or neglected - we may know better, but again it will be viewed as conjecture and cannot be verified. Publish what can be verified, and hopefully that will be warning enough. I for one would avoid a shelter whose owner had been convicted of improper practices! Roger & the Fibonacci Ferts [Posted in FML issue 3842]