The author of that article was actually correct in saying a ferret can do damage to a home. So can most every other type of animal. However, he shouldn't have singled out ferrets as he did. That said, I also have no problem with a landlord asking for a higher security deposit for anyone who has pets. If I were a landlord I certainly would, even for ferrets. We all know that few ferrets are 100% with the litter pan. It can cost up to $1000 to replace a room of carpeting. I've always thought that pet owners whould be required to pay a higher deposit. If there is no damage, you get your money back when you move. If there is damage, then you, not the landlord should be held responsible for the damage. As a pet owner, I've always been proactive and volunteered an additional "pet deposit" upfront rather than waiting for the prospective landlord to request it. That approach has always worked, even in "no pets" rentals. [DA] [Posted in FML issue 3600]