FERRET-SEARCH Archives

Searchable FML archives

FERRET-SEARCH@LISTSERV.FERRETMAILINGLIST.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ela Heyn <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 22 Mar 1998 17:12:07 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (126 lines)
This is the final (whew!) portion of the survey results to be reported.  170
people responded to the statewide portion, of the 188 people who responded
to the survey overall.  I received responses from 44 states and the District
of Columbia.
 
The question was which state people lived in, and whether they would be
interested in statewide gatherings in that state.  The response options
were: Definitely interested, probably interested, might be interested, and
not interested.  The responses are as follows.  (I didn't do percentages
this time, since there weren't enough people for statistically significant
percentages).
 
1.  New Jersey - 15 respondents
    1 definitely, 13 probably, 1 might
 
2.  California - 13 respondents
    9 probably, 1 might, 3 no
 
3.  New York - 11 respondents
    10 probably, 1 no
 
4.  Florida - 9 respondents
    1 definitely, 4 probably, 4 might
 
5.  Maryland - 9 respondents
    2 definitely, 6 probably, 1 no
 
6.  Pennsylvania - 9 respondents
    9 probably
 
7.  Massachusetts - 8 respondents
    3 definitely, 5 probably
 
8.  Washington State - 8 respondents
    7 probably, 1 might
 
9.  Michigan - 5 respondents
    1 definitely, 3 probably, 1 might
 
10. Illinois - 5 respondents
    1 definitely, 3 probably, 1 might
 
11. Virginia - 5 respondents
    3 probably, 2 might
 
12. Vermont - 5 respondents
    2 probably, 3 might
 
13. Arizona - 5 respondents
    5 probably
 
14. Georgia - 4 respondents
    4 probably
 
15. Texas - 4 respondents
    3 probably, 1 no
 
16. Minnesota - 4 respondents
    3 probably, 1 might
 
17. Colorado - 3 respondents
    4 probably
 
18. Ohio - 3 respondents
    2 probably, 1 might
 
19. Nebraska - 3 respondents
    2 probably, 1 might
 
20. Connecticut - 3 respondents
    2 probably, 1 might
 
21. Indiana - 3 respondents
    3 probably
 
22. New Hampshire - 3 respondents
    1 definitely, 3 probably
 
23. Oregon - 3 respondents
    2 probably, 1 might
 
24. North Carolina - 2 respondents
    1 probably, 1 might
 
25. South Carolina - 2 respondents
    1 probably, 1 might
 
26. Nevada - 2 respondents
    1 probably, 1 no
 
27. Utah - 2 respondents
    1 definitely, 1 probably
 
28. West Virginia - 2 respondents
    2 probably
 
29. Kansas - 2 respondents
    1 definitely, 1 probably
 
30. Louisiana - 2 respondents
    1 definitely, 1 probably
 
31. South Dakota - 1 respondent (probably)
32. Tennessee - 1 respondent (probably)
33. Iowa - 1 respondent (probably)
34. Rhode Island - 1 respondent (probably)
35. Arizona - 1 respondent (probably)
36. Kentucky - 1 respondent (probably)
37. Alabama - 1 respondent (probably)
38. Deleware - 1 respondent (probably)
39. Mississippi - 1 respondent (might)
40. Washington DC - 1 respondent (probably)
41. Oklahoma - 1 respondent (probably)
42. New Mexico - 1 respondent (probably)
43. Missouri - 1 respondent (probably)
44. Wisconsin - 1 respondent (probably)
45. Maine - 1 respondent (probably)
 
- Ela
    ___     ___
   (000)___(000)        Ela Heyn
   /   @    @  \        [log in to unmask]
   |           |
   ======@======    http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/5483
[Posted in FML issue 2255]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2