FERRET-SEARCH Archives

Searchable FML archives

FERRET-SEARCH@LISTSERV.FERRETMAILINGLIST.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Margie 'S ferts & her <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 7 Jun 1997 08:39:20 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
Consider the fact that they had to know in advance of the one study which
would automatically condemn the ferret.  The bat rabies variance has no shed
study done for any animal.
 
Why did she force the gentleman to file a complaint, isn't this a free
country?  She did not have a valid warrant to take possession of the animal
which is private property.  Why would she not let any one see Kodo, even the
ferrets own vet?  When asked by the vet to see the animal she said "You will
need a court order."  She didn't have a court order to take possession of
the animal.  Please get the whole story.
[Posted in FML issue 1960]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2