The author of that article was actually correct in saying a ferret can do
damage to a home.  So can most every other type of animal.  However, he
shouldn't have singled out ferrets as he did.  That said, I also have no
problem with a landlord asking for a higher security deposit for anyone
who has pets.  If I were a landlord I certainly would, even for ferrets.
 
We all know that few ferrets are 100% with the litter pan.  It can cost
up to $1000 to replace a room of carpeting.  I've always thought that pet
owners whould be required to pay a higher deposit.  If there is no damage,
you get your money back when you move.  If there is damage, then you, not
the landlord should be held responsible for the damage.
 
As a pet owner, I've always been proactive and volunteered an additional
"pet deposit" upfront rather than waiting for the prospective landlord to
request it.  That approach has always worked, even in "no pets" rentals.
 
[DA]
[Posted in FML issue 3600]