FERRET-SEARCH@LISTSERV.FERRETMAILINGLIST.ORG
|
|
Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Tue, 28 Sep 1999 06:55:48 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Ok, you hidden lawyers on the list. I have a question prompted by a
discussion yesterday with an MU law student concerning ferrets in CacaLand.
I mentioned that Marshall Farms had won their law suit in California, but
that the CaCaLand Fish Gestapo and Peanut Brain Society had challenged the
ruling in a higher court. Then I mentioned the poor fella who recently had
his ferrets grabbed. The law student I was talking to asked "Why doesn't
the guy file some sort of a stay with the court until the appeals court
makes a ruling? If the original ruling could force a state agency to
reverse a rule, such as making ferrets legal, then a judge should allow a
stay until the ruling is upheld or reversed since it could be retroactive
to the original ruling."
Now, I know nothing about law (except how to break them). My question is,
does anyone know enough CaCaLand law to know if this has a possibility of
working? And if my informant is off base, please be nice. She makes great
tacos.
Don't everybody jump up at once....
Bob C and 18 Mo' Legal Leg Scratchers
[Posted in FML issue 2819]
|
|
|