Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.FERRETMAILINGLIST.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - FERRET-SEARCH Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

FERRET-SEARCH Archives

Searchable FML archives

FERRET-SEARCH@LISTSERV.FERRETMAILINGLIST.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
FERRET-SEARCH Home FERRET-SEARCH Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
PERSONAL BIAS & FERRET-BITE INCIDENTS
From:
Debbie Utter <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 4 May 1998 18:34:54 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
This is in response to the post re "Change to CA Rabies Compendium-- Allows
for Personal Bias." When we took our ferret to our vet for his rabies shot,
I asked the vet what would happen if our ferret bit someone (I live in NY):
automatic killing, or quarantine?  He said it's a delicate situation.  We
SHOULD be ok in NY (and reminded me that ferrets are illegal in NYC), but
also said that it would be up to the local health officer.  If that officer
decides to have the ferret killed, there's absolutely nothing we can do
about it!  Not very comforting.  I agree that the CA compendium was worded
very deliberately with language that could be interpreted by the individual
in charge as they wished.  I guess all we can do is keep lobbying for
stricter language and keep our ferrets faces away from strangers!!
[Posted in FML issue 2298]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.FERRETMAILINGLIST.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV