FERRET-SEARCH@LISTSERV.FERRETMAILINGLIST.ORG
|
|
Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | The Ferret Mailing List (FML) |
Date: | Wed, 14 Oct 1992 22:04:22 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
With that out of the way, do people think it's worth going back
on autopilot for a while? It was working pretty well.
After that brief flurry of "problems" (the only ones in 5 years)
culminating in me being called a "Tyranical (sic) Dictator", plus
a couple of unsubscribes, I think it's probably worth opening
up discussion of whether I'm doing the right thing or not. In order
to make it possible for people to speak their mind, I have come
up with a way for you to "post" anonymously if you wish. If it's
okay with Bill that is. Namely, send your comments to Bill
Gruber ([log in to unmask]), he'll strip the identification
information, and submit it as an anonymous message to the list.
I'll leave things off autopilot for a while so that I can regulate
flow to something manageable if a lynch mob gets rolling.
Bill can report on whether I've interfered with the contents.
I just ask that people be brief, and I'd prefer that people commenting
should have been a subscriber for at least 10 issues.
This is a brief description of FML policy:
1) must be on the subject of ferrets, or about a subscriber.
Ie: on topic, or of concern to other subscribers.
2) no material that I feel is simply offensive.
(this, of course, has to take into account timing too).
3) no ARC (or similar) propaganda.
4) No forgeries. Ie: return email addresses should be valid -
aside from what I'm proposing above, I should be able to
identify the origin of any message. Which can be suppressed
when the mailing list is sent out (if requested).
5) I don't alter content of anything.
6) News or network gatewaying requires permission.
In 5 years and 330 issues I have:
a Invoked rule (1) once. Issue 324.
b Invoked rule (2) & (4) once. Back in March. (Karl)
c Got caught by same posting that violated (2) and (4) getting
through because the list was on autopilot. (Karl)
d Rule (3) has never been invoked (I thought I was going to get
a flood at one point, but it never materialized).
e Never summarily unsubscribed anybody or refused a subscription.
f Never refused permission for gatewaying (there are, I believe,
three gateways in total)
[Posted in FML issue 0331]
|
|
|