FERRET-SEARCH@LISTSERV.FERRETMAILINGLIST.ORG
|
|
Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Thu, 22 May 1997 02:02:04 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>The Applellate Court brief was very short, and actually it was ferret
>friendly, focussing on language issues in the CDC Compendium of 1997. It
>stated firmly that execution (why do they call it euthanasia?) is NOT
>mandatory in all cases involving animals in whom shedding periods are not
>conclusively determined.
I've been wondering the same thing. I have always considered euthanasia to
be defined as "mercy killing," a last shot for a poor fuzzy (or human, if
we weren't all so squeamish about it, but that's of course MHO :) near the
end. This is *not*, in my philosopher's picky opinion about semantics,
euthanasia -- it is indeed simply the completely unnecessary *killing* of
an innocent animal.
Calling it euthanasia is just another attempt by TPTB to sugar-coat a
reprehensible act by slapping a euphemistic label on it.
GO KODO!!!
-Tasha
"It has been said that man is a rational animal. All my life I have been
searching for evidence which could support this."
-- Bertrand Russell
[Posted in FML issue 1944]
|
|
|