FERRET-SEARCH@LISTSERV.FERRETMAILINGLIST.ORG
|
|
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jun 1996 08:11:00 -0400 |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I don't mean to be provocative or anything: but a couple of things in the
last ed. struck me as odd.
Let me say, first of all, that because I live in NC (home of the Nastiest
Living Epidemiologist In Government) and because I have actually had a
ferret bite a teenager (situation saved by an understanding MD, God bless
him), I am completely on the side of campaigning against government
confiscation of ferrets.
But in the last edition, I saw the word "murder" used in conjunction with
this kind of confiscation for lethal testing; the word "martyr" followed in
a posting, in a different context. These words trouble me: "murder" refers
to the taking of a human life for purposes of perceived gain or hatred. A
"martyr" is someone killed explicitly for inflexibility of belief or for
integrity of conviction who then becomes a symbol.
While ferret deaths are tragic, irrational and must be resisted, this kind
of language tends, in my mind, to suggest a loss of perspective. Words
matter. I think it would be well to reserve words such as these. When
"murder" means any killing of some loved creature, I have no powerful
language to use when they come for my son. When "martyr" applies to my
four-legged, no matter how unjustly killed, I have no more words to apply to
saints, heros, or messiahs.
Final note: I have written my letter to his honor of Michigan, and stand
ready to wax rhetorical on behalf of any alleged malefactor on four legs.
otter
[Posted in FML issue 1605]
|
|
|