BTW, thank you to people being patient about my eye not being up to
catching typos or rereading often to find common errors we all make.

Anyway, combining
<http://www.health.harvard.edu/newsweek/Glycemic_index_and_glycemic_load_for_100_foods.htm>

With this ref which shows what the numbers mean
<http://www.diabetes.org/food-and-fitness/food/planning-meals/the-glycemic-index-of-foods.html>

Peas are only moderate while sweet potatoes are low within the high
category.

Again, that hypothesis has not yet had support from any rigorous study
but for those who want to try following it that data will be wanted.

On dogs and their dietary adaptations here is a bit before my eye gives
out again but notice the number for starch digestion is ten, so I may
have erred in recalling twelve or there may have Beene couple of
nonstarch ones sticking in my memory.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23354050

<https://www.sciencenews.org/article/starchy-diet-may-have-transformed-wolves-dogs>

<http://news.sciencemag.org/plants-animals/2013/01/diet-shaped-dog-domestication>

Phylogenetic and gene-centric metagenomics of the canine intestinal
microbiome reveals similarities with humans and mice

And more

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3105739/

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22647637

http://vetmed.tamu.edu/gilab/staff/dr-jan-suchodolski

My eye is giving out so...

[Posted in FML 7964]