Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.FERRETMAILINGLIST.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - FERRET-SEARCH Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

FERRET-SEARCH Archives

Searchable FML archives

FERRET-SEARCH@LISTSERV.FERRETMAILINGLIST.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
FERRET-SEARCH Home FERRET-SEARCH Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: NYC legalization
From:
Eric A Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Ferret Mailing List (FML)
Date:
Mon, 25 Jan 1993 21:46:14 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Actually, I was thinking of writing to the judge to say that I actually
_did_ turn down a job in NYC because of the illegality of keeping my
little girls with me.  I was also going to include the fact that even
though my building has a rat problem, I've never had any trouble at
all in my room.  They just won't go anywhere near the ferrets.  So if the
ruling has something to do with ferrets spreading disease, that
would indicate that they probably do infinitely more to prevent the
spread of diseases than they could ever do to cause them.
 
However, given the points brought up by Mr. Gruber, I'll wait and hope
whoever requested the letters in the first place posts again to
answer about what the exact situation is and whether the lawyer in the
case agrees that the letters are a good idea.
 
E.S., Hershey, and Nestle'
 
[Posted in FML issue 0408]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.FERRETMAILINGLIST.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV