FERRET-SEARCH Archives

Searchable FML archives

FERRET-SEARCH@LISTSERV.FERRETMAILINGLIST.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Williams, Bruce" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 8 Nov 2000 09:06:48 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Dear Amy:
 
>I was told that discharge isn't indicative of adrenal (by my vet, I
>believe).  My vet suspected an infection based on the discharge, but that
>is all in the past, it turns out Miya *did* have adrenal and everything
>went back to normal.  It's just that this is the first time I've heard of
>the discharge associated with adrenal.  Anyone else shocked?  Anyone else
>know this?  I'd like to mention it to my vet for her future reference if
>this is "fact." Thanks!
 
Stump pyometras in adrenal ferrets are indeed "fact" and can result in a
vaginal discharge.  They are less common that vaginal or kidney infections,
but they can be a sign of adrenal disease.  However, this is not to say
that everytime you see a vaginal discharge, you put adrenal at the top of
your list.
 
Veterinary diagnosis, for the most part, is based on the compilation of a
number of clinical signs and laboratory tests.  In the case of adrenal
disease, a vaginal discharge may be present, but in the absence of any
other signs, it should go at the bottom of your ruleout list rather than
the top.
 
Shocking? No - shouldn't be.
 
With kindest regards,
 
Bruce Williams, dVM
[Posted in FML issue 3231]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2